Skip to main content

Expand Uncensored model coverage for creators, within hard legal limits

Feature RequestsNew ModelImageVideoCensorship

Please keep expanding Uncensored coverage across Venice Studio, especially Image Edit and Image-to-Video.

Venice already has strong Uncensored options such as Seedream V5 Pro, Seedream V5 Lite, Seedream V4.5, Qwen Image 3, Qwen Image 3 Pro, and Qwen Edit Uncensored. That is the right direction. The remaining gap is that many other edit and video models creators actually want to use still sit outside that path.

Uncensored here does not mean no rules and does not mean brutal or illegal content. Hard limits stay: no minors, no CSAM, no non-consensual imagery of real people, no other prohibited uses. Venice should keep those absolute rules.

What we are asking:

  1. Diplomacy with model providers to bring more Image Edit and Image-to-Video models onto an Uncensored route, or to ship Uncensored siblings where a default filtered model must stay.

  2. Let creators finish a legal adult or sensitive idea on one quality model instead of bouncing between a good editor and a permissive editor.

  3. Badge must match behavior. If a model still blurs, reclothes, or sanitizes lawful adult source images, do not call it Uncensored.

Venice handles provider negotiation. Creators need a wider Uncensored menu so the work in our heads can come out cleanly, inside the rules that must never move.

2 comments

Log in to comment and vote

Comments2

  • Sapphire Geyser

    •

    Sep 28

    That is absolutely true. Many of us create marketable content. Platforms like Fansly allow you to monetize content featuring AI-generated avatars. One way to keep fans engaged is by consistently producing quality content. But if the tools don't cooperate, you're in a bind. Obviously, we are talking about legal content featuring anonymous 18+ characters (AI-generated), not real people. There are agencies out there with excellent creation tools. You would think Venice would provide the right tools to compete, but it doesn't seem interested in offering a quality service. If they lack that capability, they should just be honest about it instead of wasting our time and money when there are specialized platforms delivering perfectly professional results. I’ve mentioned before that the current editors Venice offers are incapable of correctly generating male genitalia. It makes you feel like you’ve been scammed. I had to cancel my Venice Pro+ subscription and switch to a platform that actually allows this type of content generation. I would prefer to stay with Venice, as that’s where I do my creative writing, but Venice is simply falling short. It shows a shocking lack of professional integrity.

    • Scarlet Highlighter

      •

      Sep 29

      Agreed on the legal frame. This thread is about fictional 18+ characters, not real people.

      Two different problems are getting mixed:

      1. Coverage. Uncensored already exists on several txt2img models. Image Edit on the stronger editors still does not match that coverage. That is the actual request.

      2. Capability. Even when a model is willing, anatomy quality is inconsistent. That is a model skill issue. Policy text alone will not fix it.

      I am not asking Venice to become a specialized adult studio. I am asking the Uncensored lane that already exists for generate to also exist for edit, inside the same hard legal limits.

      If edit stays filtered while generate is not, the pipeline is broken. That is the gap.